"If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed."

-Albert Einstein, physicist, Nobel laureate (1879-1955)

Friday, July 17, 2009

Would You Sell Your Body?

No, I'm not talking about that. Get your mind out of the gutter.

But what if someone approached you and offered up to $2,500 for one of your kidneys? You can lead a perfectly healthy life with only one; and if the procedure is done in a legitimate hospital, it's reasonably safe. Plus, you'd be helping someone else lead a healthy life again - a bit of altruism as an added bonus.

If you think this sounds pretty idealistic, first read this article from the Atlantic; then read this dispatch from a writer who's promoting radical change in the way America deals with organ donation.

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Generation Tech

We think about technology in radically different ways than our grandparents. Sure, they had industrial machinery, and plumbing, cars, planes and trains, and the earliest mass-media technology (radio, cinema, TV); but these things were new, strange, and slightly unsettling to most people. Today's generation (and tomorrow's!) takes tech for granted as an integral part of daily life in a way that amazes the older folks.

Does this mean that technology has changed the way we actually think?

A philosopher named Martin Heidegger thought so. And he wrote a little something about the issue, "The Question Concerning Technology". (NB: Heidegger was a philosopher, plus he wrote in German, so the original's a little...dense.) A post on the TalkingPhilosophy blog summarizes it nicely this way:

He argues that we are all enmeshed in a technological way of life — our
problems, activities, agendas and so on happen in a social world where
everything is regarded as a standing reserve, a stockpile. [...] We see our problems as technological problems, and our solutions are technological too. It’s all
we can see because we’re stuck in the world we’ve thought oursleves into.
He tells us that we can maybe get out again by reflection on the senses in which
we are enveloped by technology, instead of further attempts to save ourselves
from it with yet more of it. We can look to art, he says, and maybe build
an aesthetic outlook into our way of life. We can think of the mountain as
beautiful, not simply as a source of coal.

What do you think? Is there really such a thing as "a technological way of life"? By using tech so much, have we forgotten how to solve our problems...except with more technology?? And do back-to-the-earth eco-types represent a new (old) way of thinking?

Open-Source College?

Here's an example of a contemporary topic - open-source information - that leads directly to a philosophical discussion.

In yesterday's Wired Campus feature in the Chronicle of Higher Education, David Wiley offers his perspective on the value of 'open teaching' - that is, making course materials, readings, assignments, and even lectures freely accessible not only to students in the course, but to anyone at all on the web.

Read the article (and comments posted by readers!), then respond below. How do you balance considerations of fairness to paying students with what we might call the 'open-source ethos' - the presumption that information should be distributed as widely and freely as possible?

Monday, July 13, 2009

Obama, Philosopher in Chief

Carlin Romano writes in the Chronicle of Higher Education [06/26/2009], describing how President Obama's foreign policy positions are informed by a commitment to philosophical principles from pragmatism to Stoic cosmopolitanism. A selection:

At its core, his teaching was ethical and political, using the intellectual tools of logic to illuminate hypocrisy and contradiction.

Sounds like philosophy to me!

Friday, July 10, 2009

Welcome!


Socrates led his philosophical discussions in the agora (public marketplace) of ancient Athens. Zeno, the founder of Stoicism, gave his lectures in the Stoa poikile ('painted porch'), a public space. There is a long tradition of doing philosophy in public. This is a good thing: first, because philosophy is not supposed to be a secret, esoteric pursuit; second, because public exposure pushes us to be as honest, thoughtful, and precise as we can in our discussions. (Consider how easy it is to be lazy with a writing assignment if you know no one's going to read it; then consider how much more careful you're likely to be if you know all your classmates will read and judge it!)

This blog is our agora. Here we will post our weekly Development Papers, and respond to each others'. I'll post course documents here, as well as discussion questions, occasional interesting tidbits and announcements, links to news items, other blogs, etc.

(Regular and substantial) participation in this blog COUNTS in the participation component (35%) of your grade, along with in-class participation, so make sure to check in and contribute often! If you've ever thought of a really great point to make in a class discussion...but thought of it too late...posting it as a follow-up on the blog is the perfect opportunity to make your voice heard!

NOTA BENE (Latin for 'note well'): don't forget that the blog is a course-related forum, and will be monitored by me for content. Basic standards of civility, respect, and adequate grammar WILL BE STRICTLY ENFORCED.

Thus says Dr. P.